Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Well, so far, only my 50 Summicron is on the list. The 35 Summilux non Asph, and the 90 Thin Tele-Elmarit are not on the list, so I will not be getting them done. Gene -------------- Original message from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com>: -------------- > At 2:09 PM +1000 9/17/06, G Hopkinson wrote: > >Unlurk Bob, it's speculation, analysis frenzy time. > >I read that the info from the coding is used for the RAW files and > >is selectable. Makes sense to me. > >No idea about the jpegs. > > > >Cheers > >Hoppy > > Again, from what I saw there's no need for the coding if you can > stand not having the focal length in the EXIF data. Rather than spend > $100 or more a pop, I'm most of the way there to another lens. > > Wait for the release version; preferably get a hands on demonstration > of coded vs. the same lens non-coded, and then decide. > > After that I think there will be few who will send their lenses off > on a perilous and expensive journey to be tattooed. > > I'm past the age where tattooing appeals to me. > > -- > * Henning J. Wulff > /|\ Wulff Photography & Design > /###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com > |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information