Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Eric said: "We as a culture continue to accept more for less -- but fail to see the sacrifice in quality." I agree and, if I wasn't having so much fun with my MF (that's "medium format", not the other "MF") gear, scanner and printer, would probably be lamenting the demise of the film lab, too. I'm wondering, though, what traditionalists like us thought during a previous photographic "revolution" -- the advent of the 35mm camera. My grandfather made all his beautiful pictures on glass plates and, later, 4 x 5 film. Their quality, even today, blows away anything that was ever created by my -- in succession -- Exakta, Petri, Miranda, Nikon, Canon, Olympus and Leica cameras. I got speed and convenience, but Grandpa created better images. He considered 35mm machines "toys" for impatient snapshooters (like that French dude HCB :-) ) . I was one who scoffed at the idea that digital could ever eclipse or even equal film in the production of high quality images, but -- unless my middle-aged eyesight is failing me -- the visual evidence is to the contrary. I still have qualms about digital archiving, but I'm also anxiously awaiting the M8 or -- better yet -- an affordable MF digital back. From the soggy Nation's Capital, Craig