Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Interesting 50mm variation (eBay shame?)
From: alal at duke.poly.edu (A. Lal)
Date: Thu Aug 3 00:12:51 2006
References: <000601c6b6a9$d4060390$6401a8c0@asus930> <414C5A87-A903-4C1B-8C67-DF65302AF6A1@mindspring.com>
 
Ric,

You've been offered sound advice here. As an example of  a seller/auction 
to avoid may I suggest you have a look at  item 140014490997 on that site. 
Note the sellers feedback. Of course, it is not always this easy to spot a 
dubious seller, but this example should give you an idea of what to look out 
for.

Regards.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ric Carter" <ricc@mindspring.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 11:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Interesting 50mm variation (eBay shame?)


>
> On Aug 2, 2006, at 11:06 PM, G Hopkinson wrote:
>
>> Ric, really, you've never been tempted?
>
> Oh, lord, yea.
>
Replies: Reply from kennybod at mac.com (Kenneth Frazier) ([Leica] Interesting 50mm variation (eBay shame?))
Reply from pjleeson at mchsi.com (Philip Leeson) ([Leica] Interesting 50mm variation (eBay shame?))
 In reply to: Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] Interesting 50mm variation (eBay shame?))
Message from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Interesting 50mm variation (eBay shame?))