Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hmm, That's veeerry interesting. It does sound as if George Washington might have qualified as a terrorist while Robert E. Lee was a patriot. I've /*always*/ considered General Lee to be a hero but then what else could you expect from a cracker like me. ;-) Walt Lottermoser George wrote: > From what I can piece together - it seems that the "terrorists" will > remain labeled as such, no matter how well they're equipped. To have > your label move from "terrorist" to "patriotic hero" you have to be > sworn to loyalty to a state government (or hired by same government). > Anyone who fights in opposition to state governments is liable to be > labeled "terrorist." I think I go that right? : ^ ) > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > george@imagist.com > > > > On Aug 2, 2006, at 9:11 AM, Walt Johnson wrote: > >> Would they still be considered terrorists then? If they had the same >> resources as their Israeli counterparts? That is a question beyond >> the scope of my world view. Perhaps the editorial board at the NYTs >> could bat it around a bit some morning over coffee and croissants?. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >