Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/07/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: The New York Times Knows Its Stuff
From: jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Tue Jul 11 18:47:57 2006

Are the two paragraphs different in meaning? Other than the word "format"
thrown in, and the order of the words changed, they seem to be saying the
exact same thing.

Jeffery Smith
New Orleans, LA
http://www.400tx.com
http://400tx.blogspot.com/



-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Robert
D. Baron
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 8:31 PM
To: lug@leica-users.org
Subject: [Leica] Re: The New York Times Knows Its Stuff


On 7-10-06 Rei Shinozuka wrote:

> if this were exchanged during a party that would have been one thing,  
> but since it was for publication, i would have found someone on my 
> staff who could answer precisely and authoritatively.  but of course, 
> it was the Times...  :-)

Forgive me for being obsessive-compulsive, but I note the response has 
now been edited.

Where it originally said:

> A. Yes, all of our photographers are equipped digitally. We currently  
> use Canon 35mm Mark II's and D5's with a variety of lenses from 10mm  
> to 600 mm. We have Hasselblad large format equipment that shoots film.

Now it has been edited to read:

> A. Yes, all of our photographers are equipped digitally. We currently 
> use 35mm-format Canon Mark II's and 5D's with a variety of lenses from 
> 10mm to 600 mm. We have Hasselblad and large format equipment that 
> shoots film.

So I'll take my meds and go to bed.....

:-)

--Bob



_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from rbaron at concentric.net (Robert D. Baron) ([Leica] Re: The New York Times Knows Its Stuff)