Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ric - Ah, lost in the bush. I see your point. I hadn't picked up on that at first, though Philippe mentioned clutter as a problem and I didn't quite see what he was getting at. Looks like I need to find a way to isolate the figures in these shots and otherwise call attention to them if this idea is going to work. Thanks for the follow up. Dick >Dick-- > >I get your point. I lose this guy in the bush, not the big city. >Maybe if you had stood on a bench to isolate him a bit, I'd see it >easier. >http://gallery.leica-users.org/NYC/2_04A_0111_web > >I like the cropped version better: >>http://gallery.leica-users.org/NYC/4_09A_0048_bw_web > >The first is still my favorite. The simplicity of all the shapes >keeps the whole thing "cleaner" feeling to me. > >Ric Carter >http://gallery.leica-users.org/Passing-Fancies > >On Jun 29, 2006, at 2:49 PM, Richard S. Taylor wrote: > >>Luis, Phillipe, Ric - Thanks for commenting. I felt myself that >>the first of these was the strongest and am pleased to hear you >>agree. >> >>Let me push back a bit on the others, though. As I said, I'm >>experimenting here. I'm trying to show individuals made small, or >>maybe made insignificant is a better way of saying it, by the "big >>city." With that in mind, do 2_4A and 1_33 make more sense or are >>they still just not working? >> >>1-33 is square, B.T.W. I think all the slightly oblique angles >>throw the eye off. >> >>I also tried a slight crop on 4_9A to de-clutter it and I think it >>may make a better photo but gets away from my original intention, >>vis: >> >>http://gallery.leica-users.org/NYC/4_09A_0048_bw_web >> >>Thanks. >> >>Dick >> >>>Hi Dick, >>> >>>The first one is another asset to your work with the 15. I can >>>imagine it working 'even' in colour. >>>2nd and 3d one are a bit too cluttered IMO: no clear >>>foreground/background separation. >>>The last one is one I wouldn't have posted, or at least levelled out. >>> >>>Thanks for showing, >>>Philippe >>> >>> >>> >>>Op 28-jun-06, om 01:51 heeft Richard S. Taylor het volgende geschreven: >>> >>>>Trying something different here. What you think of it (and them). >>>>Thanks. >>>> >>>>http://gallery.leica-users.org/NYC/4_02A_0041_web >>>> >>>>http://gallery.leica-users.org/NYC/2_04A_0111_web >>>> >>>>http://gallery.leica-users.org/NYC/4_09A_0048_web >>>> >>>>http://gallery.leica-users.org/NYC/1_33_0103_web >>>> >>>>-- >>>>Regards, >>>> >>>>Dick >>>> >>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>Leica Users Group. >>>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>>> >>> >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Leica Users Group. >>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Leica Users Group. >>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information