Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Luis, Phillipe, Ric - Thanks for commenting. I felt myself that the first of these was the strongest and am pleased to hear you agree. Let me push back a bit on the others, though. As I said, I'm experimenting here. I'm trying to show individuals made small, or maybe made insignificant is a better way of saying it, by the "big city." With that in mind, do 2_4A and 1_33 make more sense or are they still just not working? 1-33 is square, B.T.W. I think all the slightly oblique angles throw the eye off. I also tried a slight crop on 4_9A to de-clutter it and I think it may make a better photo but gets away from my original intention, vis: http://gallery.leica-users.org/NYC/4_09A_0048_bw_web Thanks. Dick >Hi Dick, > >The first one is another asset to your work with the 15. I can >imagine it working 'even' in colour. >2nd and 3d one are a bit too cluttered IMO: no clear >foreground/background separation. >The last one is one I wouldn't have posted, or at least levelled out. > >Thanks for showing, >Philippe > > > >Op 28-jun-06, om 01:51 heeft Richard S. Taylor het volgende geschreven: > >>Trying something different here. What you think of it (and them). >>Thanks. >> >>http://gallery.leica-users.org/NYC/4_02A_0041_web >> >>http://gallery.leica-users.org/NYC/2_04A_0111_web >> >>http://gallery.leica-users.org/NYC/4_09A_0048_web >> >>http://gallery.leica-users.org/NYC/1_33_0103_web >> >>-- >>Regards, >> >>Dick >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Leica Users Group. >>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information