Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] South Street Seaport and Battery Park
From: r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor)
Date: Thu Jun 29 15:47:28 2006
References: <p06230900c0c773c6034d@[131.142.12.152]> <D528BECC-D7DE-4C55-9A9B-C9AD1DF4CC97@pandora.be> <p06230907c0c9c68f5429@[10.0.1.2]> <9F7D81A5-8DCF-4A53-AD9C-E516C07B5E00@pandora.be>

Yeah, let's stay away from the whole mediocrity thing, OK?  :-) 
Reactions like  yours are what I wanted.  If it's not working, it's 
not working. So be it.  Thanks.

>The crop makes it indeed better.
>The explication you give doesn't change much to my perception of the 
>images. I understand what you're trying to convey, but for me, it 
>doesn't come out. It's due to the clutter IMO.
>I won't mentino anything about mediocrity though.
>Thanks for showing,
>Philippe
>
>
>
>Op 29-jun-06, om 20:49 heeft Richard S. Taylor het volgende geschreven:
>
>>Luis, Phillipe, Ric - Thanks for commenting.  I felt myself that 
>>the first of these was the strongest and am pleased to hear you 
>>agree.
>>
>>Let me push back a bit on the others, though.  As I said, I'm 
>>experimenting here.  I'm trying to show individuals made small, or 
>>maybe made insignificant is a better way of saying it, by the "big 
>>city."   With that in mind, do 2_4A and 1_33 make more sense or are 
>>they still just not working?
>>
>>1-33 is square, B.T.W.  I think all the slightly oblique angles 
>>throw the eye off.
>>
>>I also tried a slight crop on 4_9A to de-clutter it and I think it 
>>may make a better photo but gets away from my original intention, 
>>vis:
>>
>>http://gallery.leica-users.org/NYC/4_09A_0048_bw_web
>>
>>Thanks.
>>
>>Dick
>>
>>>Hi Dick,
>>>
>>>The first one is another asset to your work with the 15. I can 
>>>imagine it working 'even' in colour.
>>>2nd and 3d one are a bit too cluttered IMO: no clear 
>>>foreground/background separation.
>>>The last one is one I wouldn't have posted, or at least levelled out.
>>>
>>>Thanks for showing,
>>>Philippe
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Op 28-jun-06, om 01:51 heeft Richard S. Taylor het volgende geschreven:
>>>
>>>>Trying something different here.  What you think of it (and them).  
>>>>Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>http://gallery.leica-users.org/NYC/4_02A_0041_web
>>>>
>>>>http://gallery.leica-users.org/NYC/2_04A_0111_web
>>>>
>>>>http://gallery.leica-users.org/NYC/4_09A_0048_web
>>>>
>>>>http://gallery.leica-users.org/NYC/1_33_0103_web
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>Regards,
>>>>
>>>>Dick
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Leica Users Group.
>>>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Leica Users Group.
>>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Leica Users Group.
>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


-- 
Regards,

Dick

In reply to: Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor) ([Leica] South Street Seaport and Battery Park)
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] South Street Seaport and Battery Park)
Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor) ([Leica] South Street Seaport and Battery Park)
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] South Street Seaport and Battery Park)