Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]2006-06-29-16:10:17 Brian Reid: > I have a good friend whose only criterion for judging quality of > photographs is how well the skin tones are rendered on people who are not > Caucasian. Identity is race, race is skin color, and so the capture of a > person's identity (and hence the quality of the photograph) is entirely > determined by how accurately it renders the skin color. Nothing else > matters. To choose a single arbitrary technical criterion like that and try to put it in more Luggish terms, how about... - The quality of a picture is strongly correlated with the sharpness of focus of the near pupil of the primary human subject. While such a singleminded, purely-technical rule is clearly absurd as the sole means of judging photos, I must admit that when I'm editing (so the whole available universe of pictures to choose from has already been filtered through my compositional sense and seat-of-the-pants feel for the right moment to push that damned button), an awful lot of pictures seem to get to live or die based on the above rule. Discuss.