Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]LNUG = "Leica Nut's ..." :-) I wanted to try the Tele-Elmarit out in demanding situations. In almost all of these I was putting the sun behind them, strong back lighting. I figured if it was going to flare or lose contrast, that would do it. But it held up. http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/shoebox/2006v24/06v24-0005.jpg.html http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/shoebox/2006v24/06v24-0006.jpg.html http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/shoebox/2006v24/06v24-0007.jpg.html In the last one I wanted to see if its reputed lack of sharpness at closest distances was anything I would ever notice. All of these are only stopped down to f4 and I have another one wide open at 2.8. For my part, the lack of sharpness at close range is theoretical. Thanks, Daniel On 6/19/06, G Hopkinson <hoppyman@bigpond.net.au> wrote: > Daniel the shot of the young lady (your daughter?)with the pasta dish has > wonderful light for her complexion and hair. And of course Leica clarity. > I'm thinking that there should be a sub-set of the LUG, being LNUG. > Go the nineties! > > Cheers > Hoppy > Elmarit M 90 > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 26 > Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 06:03:44 +0200 > From: "Daniel Ridings" <dlridings@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Leica] PAW 24 dlridings > To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> > Message-ID: > <a2f8f4470606182103i31fac852x359dc490f14a01a3@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Sorry for the confusion, Jim. > > The link I posted was to a photo I took with the 50. But right next to > that one in the shoebox are the ones that were taken with the 90. > > 06v24-0005, 0006, 0007 and 0008 > > Starting here: > http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/shoebox/2006v24/06v24-0005.jpg.html > > Daniel > > On 6/18/06, Jim Nichols <jhnichols@bellsouth.net> wrote: > > Daniel, > > > > That is another great shot of your wife. You mention 90s in your post, > but > > your blog says its a 50. Which is it? Either way, the results are > > great. > > > > Jim Nichols > > Tullahoma, TN USA > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >