Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] PAW 24 dlridings
From: dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Sun Jun 18 21:03:48 2006
References: <a2f8f4470606181442g2cf2eb65l88dcc29d7a35a122@mail.gmail.com> <000601c69321$3a13ae50$6101a8c0@jimnichols>
 
Sorry for the confusion, Jim.

The link I posted was to a photo I took with the 50. But right next to
that one in the shoebox are the ones that were taken with the 90.

06v24-0005, 0006, 0007 and 0008

Starting here:
http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/shoebox/2006v24/06v24-0005.jpg.html

Daniel

On 6/18/06, Jim Nichols <jhnichols@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> That is another great shot of your wife.  You mention 90s in your post, but
> your blog says its a 50.  Which is it?  Either way, the results are great.
>
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Replies: Reply from jhnichols at bellsouth.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] PAW 24 dlridings)
 In reply to: Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] PAW 24 dlridings)
Message from jhnichols at bellsouth.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] PAW 24 dlridings)