Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 777
From: jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Sat Jun 17 07:10:23 2006

I've been waiting for the opportunity to use it on some faces (not the
developer...the film). I think that it has a lot of grain solvent in it, so
the wrinklier, the better face wise.

Jeffery Smith
New Orleans, LA
http://www.400tx.com
http://400tx.blogspot.com/



-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Daniel
Ridings
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 2:01 AM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] 777


Jeffery,

Any news on this front? I am curious about the developer.

Daniel

On 6/5/06, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342@cox.net> wrote:
> Well, my bags of 777 developer are sitting ready to go. I have had 
> difficulty finding much information on this developer other than all 
> of the caveats (it smells, it turns sludgy, the funkier it gets, the 
> better it works, etc.).
>
> Do any of you have any practical experience with this developer? I 
> keep reading that "agitation is critical", but then nother is 
> mentioned about just WHAT you have to do carefully when agitating.
>
> Jeffery Smith
> New Orleans, LA
> http://www.400tx.com
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] 777)