Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Doug - The quality of your work is so consistently high that it's hard to find things to say. I wonder, too, if we really understand how difficult your work is to do. Maybe if you included a subtitle along the lines of: "Shot # 241 out of 243 that afternoon after waiting a couple of hours in a chilly drizzle with my feet freezing and my back aching for the damn bird to settle down and the sun to come out and finally get low enough to produce the modelling I was after," you'd get more reaction. ;-) I have the same problem with Graham and a whole bunch of others on the list. The quality of the postings is just so consistently high that it's hard to respond interestingly. (Unless Graham posts something with a narrow boat in it, then he knows he'll get a response, of course. ;-) ) Keep 'em coming. I enjoy the looking. Dick >At 09:27 PM 6/6/2006, SonC@aol.com wrote: > >>On Jun 6, 2006, at 9:49 PM, Douglas Herr wrote: >> >>> ...The Cooper's Hawk photo I posted a couple of days ago (with ZERO >>> response from the LUG) ... >> >>I've posted hundreds with the same result. It is not about response. Post >>because you think it is good enough to be seen. They are looking. >>They / we / >>I are / am too busy to respond to all posts, but we look. > >I think the difference is that with pros like you (Sonny), Doug, >Tina, BD etc., it's more like "Wow, another great >(flowers/birds/people/...)" What's there to say :-)? > > >// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, >please use richard at imagecraft.com) > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information