Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 07:40 PM 6/6/2006, Frank Filippone wrote: >Yes, it is possible ( and probably more likely ) that the corrections are >in some software in the PC, not the camera. I did not >think of that. > >I think you are wrong in your estimate of the "extension factor" . The >lens is, and always will be, a 135mm lens. It is not, nor >ever will be a 180. The field of view is what you are referring to by >using the (badly worded adaptation of the industry) crop >factor. If the RF base is the same as the M6, then the 135/3.4 should >focus correctly. You could be right. I am not a camera tech :-) If you are right though, that probably means that the RF base is very short. There's a formula somewhere, but if a Bessa Rx can focus a 90/4 with its short RF baselength, how much shorter can the digital M be and still be compatible with Noctilux 1.0? So something doesn't smell right on this side of the pond!!! >No Speculation? .. isn't this the LUG? Yes, but LUGgers have the amazing knack of driving everything to its infinite "logical" conclusions.... Too much brain, if you ask me :-) // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please use richard at imagecraft.com)