Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/04/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Solution for your remark: Throw away the digineg after x prints, or control (and guarantee) the number of prints made from it; Use photography and all its actual sidekicks to visualize something original in your own personal way. Never use commercial value as a starting point for making a photograph if you intend to call it 'art'. Question: I thought one of the characteristics of photography was that it could be reproduced, whatever the era? Op 29-apr-06, om 13:03 heeft D Khong het volgende geschreven: > I read a newspaper article that photography is losing its place as a > serious art form. It took many years for photo images to become > acceptable. Of late, art galleries are exhibiting less and less > photographs. Art collectors seem to be less interested in acquiring > photographs. > > One reason is that digital manipulation has taken the cutting edge off > photo imaging. Gone are the days when photographs represented the real > thing. With digital imaging, it is possible to make perfect and > blemish free pictures. Manipulation took away anything that should not > be there and could added anything that can improve the final look. > Once saved digitally, you could make millions of copies anytime, > anywhere....so where's the collectible value? With film, one could at > least destroy the negative once a limited number of print editions are > made. > > Dan K. > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >