Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/04/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Marialuisa Morando - $1900
From: walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson)
Date: Thu Apr 20 16:01:48 2006
References: <6.2.3.4.2.20060419223347.02cd13b8@mail.rhtc.net> <4cfa589b0604201014j2e9e0ceaod4ea7e2fef0c12a7@mail.gmail.com> <4447DC61.3010404@waltjohnson.com> <61E7C6C0-CB9D-429C-9F56-1765F1967377@mac.com> <9283-SnapperMsg4EA12C31C06D9A39@[70.194.215.23]> <44480513.50407@waltjohnson.com> <9E94A3E4-2B20-4CF1-AAE4-FE8331A384A8@mac.com>

George:

Peace. I always wanted to dump photojournalism and be an artist. Just 
bought  one of those fancy little caps and a red ascot. Now, I are one. :-P

Walt
Lottermoser George wrote:

> Walt,
>
> I've also seen many of Ed's prints and many other fine prints (as  
> well as hordes of crap). I'm not making any comparisons of the  
> visionary qualities of various photographers. Price of prints aside -  
> I think that judging a print or a vision by a 60x60x72ppi screen  
> image makes vary little sense, except in the case raw visual /  
> emotional power - as in your very impressive work.
>
> The more subtle the aesthetic qualities the more one has to actually  
> stand in front of the print to judge it's merits or lack thereof. No  
> matter how well an image may be printed in a book the originals  
> usually take one's breath away. I've not seen a Morando print. I  
> can't speak about their aesthetic merits nor the worth of her vision  
> until I do see one in the flesh. Does her statement sound a bit  
> pretentious? Yes. Does her price for matted prints, which will fade  
> quickly if hung in a sunny California room, sound a bit out of this  
> galaxy? Yes. Does the work suck? I don't know. I've never seen it.
>
> To compare the two visions, Colen and Morando; I don't see the point.  
> I would refer to Colen as a someone working solidly within in the  
> Documentary tradition. While Morando is working within the relatively  
> infantile (to photography) Gallery/Museum/Art-rag tradition. I  
> respect both traditions. I've played in both fields. Comparing  
> individual artists within these two genres is like comparing a  
> blackened tuna steak with a mango.
>
> When I was working full time as a journalist-documentarian and  
> submitted my work to the Milwaukee Art Museum they said, "The work is  
> very fine. But it is not art fit for the home." Even though I'd justt  
> received a NEA grant to mount a show, "Light on Poverty in  
> Appalachia" in Tennessee. I was young and felt devastated. Go figure.
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george@imagist.com
>
>
>
> On Apr 20, 2006, at 5:02 PM, Walt Johnson wrote:
>
>> I've had the opportunity to see many of Edward Weston's original  
>> prints and I can guarantee Ms. Morando ain't even close. My remark  
>> about B.D. was in reply to Adam's mentioning it in his post.  
>> Languid, dreamy, etc.... :-)   My point was B.D (to me at least) is  
>> a far more advanced visionary than Morando.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>


Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Marialuisa Morando - $1900)
In reply to: Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Marialuisa Morando - $1900)
Message from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Marialuisa Morando - $1900)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] Marialuisa Morando - $1900)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Marialuisa Morando - $1900)
Message from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Marialuisa Morando - $1900)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] Marialuisa Morando - $1900)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Marialuisa Morando - $1900)