Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/04/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Craig:
That's the look I'm after. doyou have an e-mail address for Kyle?
Craig Zeni <clzeni@mindspring.com> wrote:
I have a chrome one from 1956 that's nicely coated and focuses spot
on...I bought the lens from That Guy Kyle who, if I recall, had the
lens gone thru and tuned, possible recoated I don't recall. But it's
nice with butter smooth out of focus effects.
CZ
NC
On Apr 3, 2006, at 9:57 AM, durling@cox.net wrote:
> My understanding is that the black ones are later and also coated. The
> first two numerical digits of the serial number are the year of
> production.
> Mine is black and '74. I had the opportunity to look over a couple in
> the
> shop and found the black one to be nicer than the silver ones.
>
> Even though coated it does flare under certain lighting conditions,
> and the
> focus is not perfect which is a common problem with these. Otherwise
> it is
> a very nice lens.
>
> Mike Durling
>
> Original Message:
> -----------------
> From: Bill Smith wrs111445@yahoo.com
> Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 01:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
> To: lug@leica-users.org
> Subject: [Leica] Russian Jupiter-9 85/2 lens question
>
>
> Is the silver or black one the most desirable?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bill
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> mail2web - Check your email from the web at
> http://mail2web.com/ .
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
---------------------------------
Blab-away for as little as 1?/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo!
Messenger with Voice.