Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/04/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Craig: That's the look I'm after. doyou have an e-mail address for Kyle? Craig Zeni <clzeni@mindspring.com> wrote: I have a chrome one from 1956 that's nicely coated and focuses spot on...I bought the lens from That Guy Kyle who, if I recall, had the lens gone thru and tuned, possible recoated I don't recall. But it's nice with butter smooth out of focus effects. CZ NC On Apr 3, 2006, at 9:57 AM, durling@cox.net wrote: > My understanding is that the black ones are later and also coated. The > first two numerical digits of the serial number are the year of > production. > Mine is black and '74. I had the opportunity to look over a couple in > the > shop and found the black one to be nicer than the silver ones. > > Even though coated it does flare under certain lighting conditions, > and the > focus is not perfect which is a common problem with these. Otherwise > it is > a very nice lens. > > Mike Durling > > Original Message: > ----------------- > From: Bill Smith wrs111445@yahoo.com > Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 01:17:18 -0700 (PDT) > To: lug@leica-users.org > Subject: [Leica] Russian Jupiter-9 85/2 lens question > > > Is the silver or black one the most desirable? > > Thanks, > > Bill > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > mail2web - Check your email from the web at > http://mail2web.com/ . > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information --------------------------------- Blab-away for as little as 1?/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.