Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/03/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] new Epson scanners
From: don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory)
Date: Sun Mar 5 04:58:48 2006
References: <02613952-F8C7-4CF5-93B9-E0095F11B75E@ralgo.nl> <9b678e0603021637g69ccafedne01e30de6b2922a9@mail.gmail.com> <FE3E9962-7C52-4705-9946-11AF21DC1EA1@ralgo.nl> <8DA4E327-1333-4DC9-99DD-65C6297D0304@btinternet.com>

Frank,
I was thinking of the V700 in a different price point, it will retail beween
549 and 799.  The 9000 is about three times that and only goes up to medium
format, if you mix in some 4x5 and 8x10 then you will be looking for other
options.  For the 35mm and 120/220 shooter the 9000 would be at the top of
the list.

Don
don.dory@gmail.com


On 3/5/06, Frank Dernie <Frank.Dernie@btinternet.com> wrote:
>
> The Nikon glass holder with masks works very well on the 8000, and I
> presume 9000, scanner(s). Using digital GEM it is a bit slow on my
> older Mac but not bad. I scan Xpan, Rolleiflex and Mamiya 7 film and
> am very happy with the results apart from 200 asa print film which
> gives hideous grain aliasing.
> Frank
>
> On 4 Mar, 2006, at 22:22, bruce wrote:
>
> > Don, the Epson demo. specialist promised to bring the new scanner
> > (V700) after the intro.; so I am now awaiting a date.
> >
> > I have a few thousand 120 slides and a multitude of 35mm which I
> > need to scan sooonest. The Imacon is too expensive and slow, the
> > Nikon combined has holder problems at 120 and is slow; so I think
> > that it leaves only the V700 (one or other) to resolve the
> > situation. Other ideas are welcome?
> >
> > B.
> >
> > On 3-mrt-2006, at 1:37, Don Dory wrote:
> >
> >> Bruce,
> >> The V700 showed some very good scanning capability at 6400dpi.
> >> The pro
> >> version gives you an adapter to scan a large format piece of film
> >> perfectly
> >> flat at the exact focus point of the mechanism.  For the person,
> >> lab, or
> >> studio that does a good number but not a lot this makes a lot of
> >> sense.  For
> >> me, the ability to get a pretty good scan of my medium format film
> >> and do
> >> easy digital proof sheets make this a probably winner.
> >>
> >> Don
> >> don.dory@gmail.com
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2/27/06, bruce <bruce@ralgo.nl> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Overlooked, seemingly, by the PMA reports are two new Epson
> >>> scanners.
> >>>
> >>> The Pro version should be a solution to the problems discussed by
> >>> members over the last weeks. If you don't already know about this,
> >>> please go to:
> >>>
> >>> http://www.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/consumer/consDetail.jsp?
> >>> BV_UseBVCookie=yes&oid=63056500
> >>>
> >>> Oh yeah ...................... price, of the Pro version, to be
> >>> around $750.
> >>>
> >>> Happy reading,
> >>> B.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Leica Users Group.
> >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from bruce at ralgo.nl (bruce) ([Leica] new Epson scanners)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] new Epson scanners)
Message from bruce at ralgo.nl (bruce) ([Leica] new Epson scanners)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] new Epson scanners)