Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: C-41 Processing [was Re: [Leica] Random evil thoughts]
From: don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory)
Date: Wed Feb 22 19:19:02 2006
References: <9b678e0602211943r11cb62d5u12d232a1310f385f@mail.gmail.com> <p06230913c0222dfad530@10.0.1.2> <4cfa589b0602221107p3b80ffaq93eddd451f19a08e@mail.gmail.com> <9b678e0602221642h4b7f4bb3t96826b96d37033ab@mail.gmail.com> <43FD06E2.4030106@adrenaline.com> <9b678e0602221707v6461a720rfd8c0cf8f8b75edc@mail.gmail.com> <43FD118F.2050705@adrenaline.com> <9b678e0602221843s3a67c121s69f8324178f7f05d@mail.gmail.com> <43FD2555.6060709@adrenaline.com>

The trick with a commercial lab is to get comfy with their idiosyncrasies.
What developer do they use, do they individually adjust the processing to
your requests or are all the +1 done the same.  How do they feel about HP5
at 800 or do they see better results at 650 or 1000.  Will they do a clip
test to find out how your metering works with their process?

None of this is very hard, just stop by and have a pleasant conversation
about what works best in their system.  If you get a good feel and others
recommend them as being clean and consistent then go for it.

Don
don.dory@gmail.com


On 2/22/06, Scott McLoughlin <scott@adrenaline.com> wrote:
>
> BTW, tomorrow my dad is coming down to visit, and if I can
> pry him away from figure skating on the tele, I'll drag him down
> to the DADA exhibit at the national gallery.  I love to shoot
> inside the museum, and typically have used HP5+ at ISO 800
> in the past.
>
> XP2 just isn't going to cut it here, as you point out - under exposure
> gives a really gritty look (nice in itself, but not what I'm looking for
> shooting the museum's loverly architecture).
>
> I got to get on the phone to Chrome and B&W Labs here in town
> and talk to them about processing pushed HP5+. I do it (or more
> accurately at this point, "did it") in HC-110 (H) with very, very gentle
> agitation and have been happy with the results, but I'm worried what
> even a decent commercial lab might do to it.
>
> Maybe I'm too paranoid.  Soup and a contact sheet isn't too pricey,
> and if I could become comfy with a commercial lab, I'd be able to
> catch up on a 7.5 month backlog of undeveloped film.
>
> Scott
>
> Don Dory wrote:
>
> >Scott,
> >I don't think that C-41 will go away anytime soon, it just will not be as
> >ubiquitous as it has been.  I believe that probably the best E-6 lab in
> town
> >is doing as much C-41 work as E-6 work now so at least one outlet in
> Atlanta
> >for the long term.
> >
> >Seth will be smiling at me, but for C-41 B&W films, the current Kodak
> >offering is very much superior to XP-2.  XP-2 is just too tricky compared
> to
> >the Kodak offering.  I think it is really a 200 ISO emulsion, it doesn't
> >respond well to underexposure, grain can be an issue in thin parts of the
> >negative, the base can scratch fairly easily, and other reasons not to
> >appreciate this film.
> >
> >An alternative would be to shoot color negative film and have it
> converted
> >to B&W.  Your local Ritz can do this very easily, if they have a Frontier
> >they can also play with sharpness and contrast but will not want to.
> >
> >Don
> >don.dory@gmail.com
> >
> >
> >On 2/22/06, Scott McLoughlin <scott@adrenaline.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Interesting. This has recently become an "issue" that's important to
> >>me.  Up to this past summer, I shot color in digital, and B&W in
> >>traditional films that I would soup myself. Now, I just don't have the
> >>energy (due to illness) to soup my B&W film - I have an embarrasing
> >>pile of the stuff yet to be developed :-(
> >>
> >>So I've started shooting XP2 and having it developed for me, using
> >>4x6 prints for proofing. I have a bunch of it in the freezer, and so
> far,
> >>it seems to do the trick well enough. Ok not well enough, but I'll take
> >>what I can get at this point :-)  I've spoken to the guy at the local
> Ritz
> >>down the street about properly processing/printing XP2, and he seems
> >>sensitive to the issue, and I don't get any weird blue or green prints
> >>that
> >>I've gotten in past years.
> >>
> >>I've also got some Fuji chrome film (Velvia 50 and Provia) and some
> >>Fuji mailers, but I've had a *HELL* of a time scanning slides that
> >>even *remotely* resemble what they look like through my Mamiya
> >>loupe.  Maybe I need more practice here - don't know.
> >>
> >>But my health is starting to look up, and maybe I'll get back to good
> >>old traditional film grain soon enough!
> >>
> >>Since I got sick, I've learned that a big advantage of living in a big
> >>city is access to a wide variety of medical specialists. Now I can add
> >>access to C-41 processing :-)
> >>
> >>Scott
> >>
> >>Don Dory wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Scott,
> >>>Your question gets to the heart of my question.  In small towns I think
> >>>
> >>>
> >>that
> >>
> >>
> >>>the closing of minilabs will happen sooner than later.  You will still
> be
> >>>able to get your digital capture printed, but C-41 films will have to
> be
> >>>farmed out probably to Kodak.  In a more urban environment, I believe
> >>>
> >>>
> >>that
> >>
> >>
> >>>the current density of labs will thin out quite a bit.  Here in Atlanta
> >>>where I live you probably could hit a C-41 machine every half mile on
> >>>average; however, I don't see much film hanging.  Plenty of digital
> >>>
> >>>
> >>prints
> >>
> >>
> >>>but not a lot of film.
> >>>
> >>>I suspect that in the rural and very suburban enviromments, those labs
> >>>
> >>>
> >>that
> >>
> >>
> >>>have figured out new strategies to survive such as wedding, portrait,
> >>>retouching, restoration, novelties, scrapbooking, studio, custom
> >>>
> >>>
> >>printing,
> >>
> >>
> >>>digital printing will look at the time and expense of keeping the C-41
> up
> >>>and running and at some point will decide to scrap the beast.
> >>>
> >>>I also suspect that the drug store lab will morph into your digital
> print
> >>>center and will lose the C-41 machine as well.  For drug stores and
> even
> >>>Wal-Mart the print business is a lure to get people in the store.  Once
> a
> >>>customer graces the front door, they are almost guarenteed a $50 basket
> >>>
> >>>
> >>at
> >>
> >>
> >>>the check out counter.
> >>>
> >>>Don
> >>>don.dory@gmail.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>On 2/22/06, Scott McLoughlin <scott@adrenaline.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Is this mostly an issue in small towns or suberbs?
> >>>>
> >>>>At least the various Ritz cameras around downtown DC I
> >>>>sometimes use always have someone in the back working at the
> >>>>machine and cranking out prints.  I don't know about the Penn
> >>>>Cameras downtown because the "guts of the operation" are not
> >>>>visible.  But Penn is still renting out MF film gear, selling film
> >>>>including a reasonable selection of B&W films and 120 films,
> >>>>and so forth.
> >>>>
> >>>>Is this some kind of "special case"?
> >>>>
> >>>>Scott
> >>>>
> >>>>Don Dory wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Adam,
> >>>>>The hassle of keeping your typical mini-lab C-41 up to snuff is no
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>light
> >>
> >>
> >>>>>matter for the home enthusiast.  Volumes start at about 10 litres and
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>you
> >>
> >>
> >>>>>would have to run possibly 5 rolls a day to keep the chemistry fresh.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>Then
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>there is the rack maintenance to keep dried chemistry from scratching
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>your
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>negatives.  For the home, the Jobo system makes much more sense..
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Don
> >>>>>don.dory@gmail.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>On 2/22/06, Adam Bridge <abridge@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>If these minilabs start being sold maybe there's an opportunity
> there
> >>>>>>for a really wiz-bang home lab!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>On 2/22/06, Richard S. Taylor <r.s.taylor@comcast.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>(snip)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>So, those of you who use C-41, how busy are your labs?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Don - The short answer is not very busy at all, at least as far as
> >>>>>>>C-41 processing is concerned.  I would guess that part of his
> >>>>>>>business has dropped to about 25% of what it was at its peak.  To
> >>>>>>>survive, he has had to change with the times.  He (actually, one
> man
> >>>>>>>plus one gal on the counter) now offers a wide range of digital
> >>>>>>>printing services, portraiture, sports and wedding photography,
> photo
> >>>>>>>copying and restoration, and does a lot of commercial business as
> >>>>>>>well as the retail he started with.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>He seems committed to keeping the C-41 service alive and long may
> he
> >>>>>>>be successful.  His product is superior to either of the two local
> >>>>>>>alternatives, a CVS and a video store.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>I processed my own B&W film (35, 120, 616, 116) for years.  Now the
> >>>>>>>convenience of C-41 really appeals, particularly since the shop
> does
> >>>>>>>good work and deals with the hassle of scanning all the negatives.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>(snip)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Don
> >>>>>>>>don.dory@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>Leica Users Group.
> >>>>>>>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
> information
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>--
> >>>>>>>Regards,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Dick
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>Leica Users Group.
> >>>>>>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
> information
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>>>Leica Users Group.
> >>>>>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>>Leica Users Group.
> >>>>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>--
> >>>>Pics @ http://www.adrenaline.com/snaps
> >>>>Leica M6TTL, Bessa R, Nikon FM3a, Nikon D70, Rollei AFM35
> >>>>(Jihad Sigint NSA FBI Patriot Act)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>Leica Users Group.
> >>>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>Leica Users Group.
> >>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>--
> >>Pics @ http://www.adrenaline.com/snaps
> >>Leica M6TTL, Bessa R, Nikon FM3a, Nikon D70, Rollei AFM35
> >>(Jihad Sigint NSA FBI Patriot Act)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Leica Users Group.
> >>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Leica Users Group.
> >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> >
>
> --
> Pics @ http://www.adrenaline.com/snaps
> Leica M6TTL, Bessa R, Nikon FM3a, Nikon D70, Rollei AFM35
> (Jihad Sigint NSA FBI Patriot Act)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Random evil thoughts)
Message from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) (C-41 Processing [was Re: [Leica] Random evil thoughts])
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) (C-41 Processing [was Re: [Leica] Random evil thoughts])
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) (C-41 Processing [was Re: [Leica] Random evil thoughts])
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) (C-41 Processing [was Re: [Leica] Random evil thoughts])
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) (C-41 Processing [was Re: [Leica] Random evil thoughts])
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) (C-41 Processing [was Re: [Leica] Random evil thoughts])
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) (C-41 Processing [was Re: [Leica] Random evil thoughts])