Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] silver vs pixels
From: don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory)
Date: Tue Feb 21 15:46:03 2006
References: <a2f8f4470602210806o5a62b9bo1af2cecde6a88afe@mail.gmail.com> <NEBBJDFBIKOBILIKPPBNKEPODNAB.red735i@earthlink.net> <a2f8f4470602210821n5d385ca4m3f7595a90be96835@mail.gmail.com> <F6FD7FF8180B97E95144140B@hindolveston.reid.org>

Brian,
Go with Tina's suggestion.  If you can go with the 3X price you will have a
printer that will deliver stunning B&W as well as color with no messing
around.  Additionally, with your studio, printing 16X20's without outlabbing
is a benefit.  After pricing 16X20's locally, the printer will be cheap with
a payback of 120 prints assuming no other benefit(including reduced ink/page
costs)

When I went with the R800 I assumed that I could out lab the larger prints,
yes I can but it is expensive for the number that I would like to do.

0.02

Don
don.dory@gmail.com


On 2/21/06, Brian Reid <reid@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> wrote:
>
> There are currently 1020 people subscribed to the LUG.
> I don't think more than 100 of them have /ever/ posted, and on average
> it's the same two dozen people who do most of the posting.
>
> But I think I should buy an Epson 2400 printer, based on what I've learned
> from this thread.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)