Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: DMR mk II ?
From: nickbroberts at yahoo.co.uk (Nick Roberts)
Date: Sun Feb 5 05:55:32 2006
 
I can't see what purpose would be served by an R10
right now. Unless it's less ugly than the R8/R9, of
course - surely the R9 has just about everything. A
DMR II at some point makes much more sense, I would
think.

Nick

(Not an R user, to be fair)

--- Eric Korenman <faneuil@gmail.com> wrote:

> Seems I touched on a nerve with this thread.
> It will be interesting to see if this is the end of
> the R line.
> A DMR mk II or R10 seems to be just a fantasy..
> 
> my subjects never look plastic - but I might be..
> Eric
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for
> more information
> 



        
        
                
___________________________________________________________ 
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with 
voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Replies: Reply from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] Re: DMR mk II ?)
Reply from director at ubi.edu (Lucien) ([Leica] Re: DMR mk II ?)
Reply from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] Re: DMR mk II ?)
 In reply to: Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] Re: DMR mk II ?)