Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] DMR mk II ?
From: rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig)
Date: Sat Feb 4 03:50:27 2006
References: <82c9dd70602030643l699ecaa2tc0b5706ccaee429@mail.gmail.com> <43D6032A0005EF87@mssbzhh-int.msg.bluewin.ch> <4cfa589b0602031601x7d8d8f10j9a81725f8bd87112@mail.gmail.com>
 
>I think I see things pretty well and I won't call the skin tones out
>of the 1Ds "plastic". It's just FUD.

I think this FUD, or prejudice, comes from the consumer point&shooters (of 
Canon and others brands), which do often strongly oversaturate the colors. 
But it's not an issue at the pro and prosumer level dslr cameras from any 
brand s far as I have noticed. 

On comparison shots found in the web, it seemed to me that the colortones of 
the DMR looked a bit "warmer" than those of the Canon 20d, but that was just 
my personal impression. It could have to do with the R lenses' coating more 
than with the sensor.

Didier
Replies: Reply from pwerner at bluewin.ch (pwerner@bluewin.ch) ([Leica] DMR mk II ?)
 In reply to: Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] DMR mk II ?)
Message from pwerner at bluewin.ch (pwerner@bluewin.ch) ([Leica] DMR mk II ?)
Message from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] DMR mk II ?)