Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Really like the detail, Felix. Whose lenses were you using? They certainly make your 3200 point very clear. B. On 2-feb-2006, at 1:14, F?lix L?pez de Maturana wrote: > >Hmm. One wonders if this work-around could be applied to other > digital cameras. > >For instance, if a 5D is acceptable at ISO 3200, what are the > results when underexposed two stops, ISO 12,800? > >Somebody turn out the lights and give it a go, okay? I would, but > my gear is not at hand. > >-Chris Lawson > > I never did that as I thought it wasn't necessary but just have a > look at some pictures every of them shot at 3200 ISO in very low > light situation.. The Portico de la Gloria in the cathedral of > Santiago de Compostela a middle age sculpture masterwork.. I see > myself using more often my 5D than my 1Ds MkII. and very, very > often at 3200 ISO were dynamic range is a little bit smaller than > at 100 ISO but just enough. > > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=554115 > > Regards > > Felix > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information