Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thank you Tina for the additional info. Greetings, B. On 16-jan-2006, at 22:39, Tina Manley wrote: > At 04:03 PM 1/16/2006, you wrote: >> You're going to have to explain that one to me. I always though >> that the >> amount of information in low light -- or "shadow detail" for those >> of us >> in the Pleistocene Era -- depended on exposure? As far as I know >> negative film still beats a DSLR in dynamic range. >> >> DaveR > > This page has an interesting chart comparing film and digital: > http://clarkvision.com/imagedetail/film.vs.digital.summary1.html > > And this page "proves" that some digital cameras have more dynamic > range than some films: > http://www.clarkvision.com/imagedetail/dynamicrange2/ > > Tina > > Tina Manley, ASMP > http://www.tinamanley.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information