Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/11/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Digilux-2, Still a Contender
From: msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad)
Date: Sat Nov 26 20:22:06 2005
References: <00e501c5f2e5$d630eb90$6601a8c0@none729d257894> <BFAE8CA1.8D8D%bdcolen@comcast.net>

what a turn around BD, u yse to be all jpg
On 11/26/05, B. D. Colen <bdcolen@comcast.net> wrote:
> I hate to say it, Martin - and this has nothing whatever to do with the
> digilux - but not shooting raw is akin to shooting Polaroid, and I don't
> mean Polaroid negative either. ;-)
>
>
>
> On 11/26/05 7:02 PM, "Martin Krieger" <krieger@usc.edu> wrote:
>
> > Is the Digilux-2 still a contender, now 2+ years after it was introduced?
> > What makes me want to own one is the f/2 lens, unheard except in DSLRs. I
> > read somewhere that the EVF is not so good, and the noise correction is a
> > problem. I'm not worried about megapixels. I won't use RAW much, since I
> > don't plan to spend time with a computer. What I want is lots of 
> > resolution
> > and detail, and the ability to shoot in low light.
> >
> > MK
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


--
  -------------------------------------
  regards, mehrdad


In reply to: Message from krieger at usc.edu (Martin Krieger) ([Leica] Digilux-2, Still a Contender)
Message from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Digilux-2, Still a Contender)