Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/11/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Digilux-2, Still a Contender
From: bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen)
Date: Sat Nov 26 19:05:43 2005
 
I hate to say it, Martin - and this has nothing whatever to do with the
digilux - but not shooting raw is akin to shooting Polaroid, and I don't
mean Polaroid negative either. ;-)



On 11/26/05 7:02 PM, "Martin Krieger" <krieger@usc.edu> wrote:

> Is the Digilux-2 still a contender, now 2+ years after it was introduced?
> What makes me want to own one is the f/2 lens, unheard except in DSLRs. I
> read somewhere that the EVF is not so good, and the noise correction is a
> problem. I'm not worried about megapixels. I won't use RAW much, since I
> don't plan to spend time with a computer. What I want is lots of resolution
> and detail, and the ability to shoot in low light.
> 
> MK 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] Digilux-2, Still a Contender)
Reply from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] Digilux-2, Still a Contender)
 In reply to: Message from krieger at usc.edu (Martin Krieger) ([Leica] Digilux-2, Still a Contender)