Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/09/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]My 4th gen seemed quite soft at the edges. A few months back I 'upgraded' to the asph and have been overjoyed with the results. Can't rule out that I had a bad 4th gen though.. Eric On 9/6/05, Luis Miguel Casta?eda <lmc@interlink.es> wrote: > > On 06/09/2005, at 4:30, Kenneth Frazier wrote: > > > between the Summicron-M 1:2/35 and the Summicron-M 1:2/35 ASPH. > > Last pre-asph (gen 4) gives great performance with low weigth and > bulk, pin sharp even at f2 with excellent contrast and bokeh, they > said that ASPH will do it better, but I don't think that they can > tell consistently the difference without a microscope. > > If you will be worrying about the best and dont mind the extra money > get the ASPH, if you're "only" looking for a brilliant lens which > will give wonderful results, then go for the gen. 4. > > > > > Saludos > ----------------------------------------- > http://imaginarymagnitude.net/blog/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >