Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I believe that the 1D Mk II and the 1Ds Mk II have the same ISO ranges, Tina. I'm not sure if the noise level of the images at the same ISO is the same between the two cameras although I'd bet it is. It isn't fast enough for real sports shooting (4 fps for the 1Ds and 8.5 fps for the 1D) and the buffer in RAW mode is only 11 shots for the 1Ds vice 20 for the 1D. I don't find that I have a limitation on frame rate for any usage except sports. On 8/12/05, Tina Manley <images@infoave.net> wrote: > At 02:10 PM 8/12/2005, you wrote: > >Hi Tina, > > > >I will wait until the new one is on the market, but based on what I > >have read so far, I still prefer the 1D2. I want the weather sealing > >and the ruggedness, features that this 5D evidently lacks. The > >full-frame sensor and the additional megapixels are less important > >for me -- the 8 MP from my 20D are already plenty enough for me. > > I agree, Nathan. When I chose the 1D Mark II over the 1Ds Mark II, > it wasn't just because of price. The 1D is faster and has higher > ISOs and so is intended for photojournalism and sports > photography. The 1Ds is more for slower fashion, commercial and > landscape where the size is more important than the speed. It sounds > like this new camera is more like the 1Ds but without the weather > sealing and metal body. My 1D is certainly heavy, but it's worth it > to have a more rugged camera. I'm pretty rough on cameras! > > Tina > > Tina Manley, ASMP > www.tinamanley.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >