Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]on 8/11/05 8:34 PM, Martin Krieger at krieger@usc.edu wrote: > This morning I went out and photographed people at bus-stops using the > Vario-Elmar (35-70, f/3.5,German), mostly set at 70mm. Then later in the > day > I photographed some street scenes using the 19mmElmarit-R, current, f/2.8. > Looking at my transparencies, I find that the quality of the faces (all > quite small, due to distance) is much better in the Elmarit images than in > the Vario-Elmar's. Maybe I did not focus well in the latter case, or > perhaps the f stop was a bit wider (less light in morning). But the > difference is noticeable. I realize this is not at all scientific or > objective, but have people similar experiences, or is this just too messy a > comparison to learn anything from it? > Martin > krieger@usc.edu > You've thrown a lot of variables into the mix but then the 19 is a certifiably awesome ultra-wide and the zoom is a mechanical re-work of a merely good japanese (minolta) zoom. Still too many variables. Doug Herr Birdman of Sacramento http://www.wildlightphoto.com