Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/07/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Focus on the glasses? Or the eyeballs?
From: firkin at balhpl01.ncable.net.au (firkin)
Date: Tue Jul 26 16:11:38 2005
References: <7629EB4795F39146A4D2ECC655CD68EA05703DD5@asc02.asc.upenn.edu>

I agree with your choice: if the frames were out of focus, I think the 
portrait would look weird: then again, sometimes weird is what we need ;-) 

Kyle Cassidy writes: 

> Someone rightly pointed out that in my recent portrait of george crumb 
> 
> http://www.asc.upenn.edu/usr/cassidy/pix/paw/2005/31/2.jpg 
> 
> I focused on the eyeglass frames, rather than the eyeballs -- and this is
> something I've always done thinking that if the eyeglass frames are in
> focus, it gives us the illusion that the FACE is in focus in a way that
> sharp eyeballs and blurry glasses frames doesn't. is there real 
> conventional
> wisdom on this? What do the real photographers do? 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
 


Alastair Firkin
www.afirkin.com
www.familyofman2.com 

In reply to: Message from KCassidy at asc.upenn.edu (Kyle Cassidy) ([Leica] Focus on the glasses? Or the eyeballs?)