Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/07/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] I flower, I think.
From: philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)
Date: Sun Jul 24 09:39:24 2005

I'd leave this one unsharpened. Sometimes unsharp masks works, sometimes it
doesn't. This one doesn't need it IMO.
I also think that a nice B&W conversion wou?ld work on it, too.


> From: Dennis Painter <dennis@hale-pohaku.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:49:13 -0700
> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] I flower, I think.
> 
> Thanks Philippe,
> 
> I don't know about the Digilux. I have the in camera settings at best 
> quality
> jpg. I used PSP for rotating, sizing and unsharp masking.
> 
> Paint Shop Pro (PSP) has the following settings with what I used for 
> unsharp
> masking:
> radus 1.00
> strength 60
> clipping 3
> 
> Same photo out of the camera,  just downsized without any sharpening in 
> PSP:
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/album242/Palm_flower_US
> 
> Should I just forget about any unsharp masking of photos from the Lumix?
> 
> 
> 
> Philippe Orlent wrote:
> 
>> If it has the same menus as the Digilux, then check if the sharpness 
>> setting
>> isn't too much. The sharpening is indeed a bit overdone IMO.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 




Replies: Reply from dennis at hale-pohaku.com (Dennis Painter) ([Leica] I flower, I think.)
In reply to: Message from dennis at hale-pohaku.com (Dennis Painter) ([Leica] I flower, I think.)