Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] new Puts article
From: s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov)
Date: Mon Jun 27 17:48:36 2005
References: <001001c57926$037b5660$6452c33e@symke> <p06210200bee5ea21a276@[10.4.1.193]>

It struck me as incoherent given the depth and clarity of dialogue on  
digital media by others.

Slobodan Dimitrov
Studio G-8, AGCC
http://sdimitrovphoto.com



On Jun 27, 2005, at 10:45 AM, Henning Wulff wrote:

> At 3:34 AM +0200 6/25/05, animal wrote:
>
>> http://www.imx.nl/photosite/comments/c014.html
>>
>
> An awful lot of sloppy/illogical thinking. Hardly any of his  
> conclusions or statements bear careful analysis.
>
> The thing I agree with, though, is that the M lenses and mount are  
> unsuitable for full frame digital use as I have contended for  
> years, for all the reasons expressed previously. Erwin seems to try  
> to work backwards from this position, and force various other  
> concepts which are not necessarily relevant to support the result.
>
> Hard to tell what the point of the article is.
>
> -- 
>    *            Henning J. Wulff
>   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
>  /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
>  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] new Puts article)
In reply to: Message from s.jessurun95 at chello.nl (animal) ([Leica] new Puts article)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] new Puts article)