Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]He knows optics; he doesn't know digital; he doesn't know photography - in the sense of what being a photographer, and making images is all about. So it's entirely logical that the article is illogical. On 6/27/05 8:48 PM, "Slobodan Dimitrov" <s.dimitrov@charter.net> wrote: > It struck me as incoherent given the depth and clarity of dialogue on > digital media by others. > > Slobodan Dimitrov > Studio G-8, AGCC > http://sdimitrovphoto.com > > > > On Jun 27, 2005, at 10:45 AM, Henning Wulff wrote: > >> At 3:34 AM +0200 6/25/05, animal wrote: >> >>> http://www.imx.nl/photosite/comments/c014.html >>> >> >> An awful lot of sloppy/illogical thinking. Hardly any of his >> conclusions or statements bear careful analysis. >> >> The thing I agree with, though, is that the M lenses and mount are >> unsuitable for full frame digital use as I have contended for >> years, for all the reasons expressed previously. Erwin seems to try >> to work backwards from this position, and force various other >> concepts which are not necessarily relevant to support the result. >> >> Hard to tell what the point of the article is. >> >> -- >> * Henning J. Wulff >> /|\ Wulff Photography & Design >> /###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com >> |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information