Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Yasuhara Reccieved Quick Review--why buy one?
From: langeratcarleton at gmail.com (Mark Langer)
Date: Fri Jun 24 13:32:00 2005
References: <ceb1a5650506241310251c9ddc@mail.gmail.com> <004b01c578f9$e9e66ef0$5540e344@newukolbqveo9i>

No, the light meter on the Minolta works differently.  You turn on the
power by a tiny switch on the front of the camera.  The meter itself
is activated by the lightest touch of your finger on the shutter
release button.  That will activate the meter long enough for you to
get a reading (shutter speed is visible in the viewfinder) and then it
turns itself off.  The shutter lever doesn't protrude at all.

I've used the CL and the Minolta, and the Minolta has some advantages.
 It meters off the shutter curtain and during exposure, off the film
itself (it was the first camera to do this)  Its rangefinder has a
wider base than the CL -- enough so that I can accurately focus my
100mm f2 Canon lens wide open with it, so I think the 40/1.4 would be
no problem.  In fact, I'm thinking of getting one of these myself. 
Right now, I pretty much have the DV 28/3.5 permanently mounted on my
CLE, but I really like 40mm as a focal length.  Anyway, I've used the
CV Bessa, which is a nice camera but I prefer the CLE.

Mark

On 6/24/05, Jeffery Smith <jls@runbox.com> wrote:
> I had a Leica CL but am left-eyed. As a result, I couldn't use the light
> meter as the lever had to be in the back position in the middle of my
> forehead.
> 
> But I did like the camera. Does the Minolta lever also have to be in the
> film advance ready position? The Voigtlander 40/1.4 would be really nice
> on that camera.
> 
> Jeffery Smith
> New Orleans, LA
> http://www.400tx.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Mark
> Langer
> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 3:11 PM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Yasuhara Reccieved Quick Review--why buy one?
> 
> 
> Have you considered a Minolta CLE?  Granted, it is an interchangable
> lens camera, but offers either metered semi-auto, or totally manual.
> A really nice camera too.
> 
> Mark
> 
> On 6/24/05, Jeffery Smith <jls@runbox.com> wrote:
> > Thanks for the offer. :-) What I really want is a totally manual one
> > (I didn't much like the shutter speed priority of the S3) but with a
> > light meter. I've gotten to the point that I shoot a f/2.8 or wider
> > open. For me, the functionality of the R3a is about as close as I can
> > get to perfection with size/weight and functionality.
> >
> > Jeffery Smith
> > New Orleans, LA
> > http://www.400tx.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org
> > [mailto:lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Mark
> > Langer
> > Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 2:07 PM
> > To: Leica Users Group
> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Yasuhara Reccieved Quick Review--why buy one?
> >
> >
> > Probably the reason why there aren't fixed lens RFs about the size of
> > a Leica CL is that the market is awash with excellent ones used.  Why
> > plunk down big bucks for a new one, when you can get a Minolta 7SII or
> 
> > 9, a Konica Auto S3 or S2, a Canon G17QL, etc, etc. for a relative
> > bargain?  In the same way that a large used market for M Leicas cuts
> > into the sales base for new M Leicas, so too do these cut into the
> > sales base for the rangefinder of your dreams.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> >
> > On 6/24/05, Jeffery Smith <jls@runbox.com> wrote:
> > > I think that the void existing in the RF area now is the small,
> > > light,
> >
> > > fixed-lens RF rather than the large, heavy, substantial RF. I
> > > generally avoid carrying a larger camera. Right now, the camera that
> 
> > > fits that description most closely would be the Bessa R with the
> > > 35/2.5 pancake on it. A fixed lens RF more along the size of the
> > > Leica
> >
> > > CL would be nice.
> > >
> > > Jeffery Smith
> > > New Orleans, LA
> > > http://www.400tx.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Yasuhara Reccieved Quick Review--why buy one?)
Reply from shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] Yasuhara Reccieved Quick Review--why buy one?)
In reply to: Message from langeratcarleton at gmail.com (Mark Langer) ([Leica] Yasuhara Reccieved Quick Review--why buy one?)
Message from jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Yasuhara Reccieved Quick Review--why buy one?)