Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Yasuhara Reccieved Quick Review--why buy one?
From: langeratcarleton at gmail.com (Mark Langer)
Date: Fri Jun 24 12:07:20 2005
References: <20050624131709.23814.qmail@web51013.mail.yahoo.com> <001401c578c0$e7588800$5540e344@newukolbqveo9i>

Probably the reason why there aren't fixed lens RFs about the size of
a Leica CL is that the market is awash with excellent ones used.  Why
plunk down big bucks for a new one, when you can get a Minolta 7SII or
9, a Konica Auto S3 or S2, a Canon G17QL, etc, etc. for a relative
bargain?  In the same way that a large used market for M Leicas cuts
into the sales base for new M Leicas, so too do these cut into the
sales base for the rangefinder of your dreams.

Mark


On 6/24/05, Jeffery Smith <jls@runbox.com> wrote:
> I think that the void existing in the RF area now is the small, light,
> fixed-lens RF rather than the large, heavy, substantial RF. I generally
> avoid carrying a larger camera. Right now, the camera that fits that
> description most closely would be the Bessa R with the 35/2.5 pancake on
> it. A fixed lens RF more along the size of the Leica CL would be nice.
> 
> Jeffery Smith
> New Orleans, LA
> http://www.400tx.com
> 
>


Replies: Reply from jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Yasuhara Reccieved Quick Review--why buy one?)
In reply to: Message from wrs111445 at yahoo.com (Bill Smith) ([Leica] Yasuhara Reccieved Quick Review--why buy one?)
Message from jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Yasuhara Reccieved Quick Review--why buy one?)