Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Probably the reason why there aren't fixed lens RFs about the size of a Leica CL is that the market is awash with excellent ones used. Why plunk down big bucks for a new one, when you can get a Minolta 7SII or 9, a Konica Auto S3 or S2, a Canon G17QL, etc, etc. for a relative bargain? In the same way that a large used market for M Leicas cuts into the sales base for new M Leicas, so too do these cut into the sales base for the rangefinder of your dreams. Mark On 6/24/05, Jeffery Smith <jls@runbox.com> wrote: > I think that the void existing in the RF area now is the small, light, > fixed-lens RF rather than the large, heavy, substantial RF. I generally > avoid carrying a larger camera. Right now, the camera that fits that > description most closely would be the Bessa R with the 35/2.5 pancake on > it. A fixed lens RF more along the size of the Leica CL would be nice. > > Jeffery Smith > New Orleans, LA > http://www.400tx.com > >