Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I used one for years making halftones for our newspaper. We went straight from neg to halftone using enlarger. Ah, the smelly old days. I also used it for contact sheets. Ilford's Multigrade RC paper and Kodak Stabilization chemicals. I found a tendency to have uneven tone unless chemicals were very fresh. Contrast also tended to be pretty low. Followed with standard Rapid Fix and wash routine. I also used Kodak's stabilization processor. It held much more chemistry and was much more expensive. I found it less reliable and needing more maintenance. IMO - Suitable for some quick prints and contacts, but not high grade prints. Ric Carter Garner, NC http://gallery.leica-users.org/Passing-Fancies On Jun 22, 2005, at 11:29 PM, lug-request@leica-users.org wrote: > Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 21:28:07 EDT > From: Afterswift@aol.com > Subject: [Leica] Spiratone Stabilizer Processor > To: lug@leica-users.org > Message-ID: <1f1.3e38759d.2feb6a27@aol.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > > Re traditional darkroom, has anyone had experience using the Spiratone > Processor, a machine that mass produced RC prints up to about > 11x16? Kodak still > makes the Activator chemical for one of their stabilizer models. > These machines > used two chemicals, but I used only the activator with a stop bath > in the > second tray. Back in the 70's when I used the Spiratone for a > college TV course, I > fixed the prints in a standard tray, followed by the usual short > wash times > for RC prints. > > Bob R >