Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]excalty the same case for me and costco, i now take to a pro lab pay double but i am happy On 6/18/05, Jeffery Smith <jls@runbox.com> wrote: > I have given up on them altogether. The Fuji machines are very good > about being able to "cover" scratches, dirt, and general abuse of the > negatives. As a result, the technicians are getting sloppier and more > incompetent in handling the negatives. The last few rolls I have taken > to Sam's Club were so badly damaged, I had to discard them. I'm taking > everything to a color lab now and just getting the negatives developed. > > Jeffery Smith > New Orleans, LA > http://www.400tx.com > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Steve > Ries > Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2005 12:57 PM > To: lug@leica-users.org > Subject: [Leica] Walgreens or Wal-Mart for C-41? > > > I want a local lab to process and print C-41. I will archive the > negs for later use so I want good chemistry. Any input which "dime > store" labs are doing the best all around working the US?. I have been > trolling the archives of various sites and Walgreens seems to be a > favorite but I would like to hear what the current views are. > > Many thanks, > Steve > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- ------------------------------------- regards, mehrdad