Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Jun 14, 2005, at 4:59 PM, B. D. Colen wrote: > The question isn't whether or not to show photos of the people in > our lives > - the question is whether to show plain old snap shots on a > photography > list. Let's show photos of the people in our lives, by all means. > But given > that we have come together as photographers, and given that we do > offer up > photos for criticism, it makes little sense to offer up photos one > wouldn't > dream of offering up as something representative of one's skill... totally agree...Steve > > > On 6/14/05 5:24 PM, "Steve Barbour" <kididdoc@cox.net> wrote: > > >> On Jun 14, 2005, at 1:11 PM, Glenn Stauffer wrote: >> >> >>> On 6/14/05, B. D. Colen <bdcolen@comcast.net> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Maybe this is an argument for people not showing family snaps on >>>> the list, >>>> but rather only showing those photos they are willing to have >>>> critiqued. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> But then I never would have seen the photos of that darling little >>> girl, Soleil, and, in the process, found a nice middle name for my >>> newborn daughter. :-) >>> >>> By all means show your family shots, but keep the silly bickering >>> private. >>> >>> --Glenn >>> >> >> if you can show images of rocks and trees, and cracks in the >> sidewalk, you can show people... and if you show people, why not >> those that touch your life... not just anonymous encounters on the >> street... >> >> >> Steve >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >