Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/05/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Another camera classic bites the dust
From: wooderson at gmail.com (Matt Powell)
Date: Fri May 27 21:20:12 2005
References: <1de.3c70cac2.2fc8dcb5@aol.com>

On 5/27/05, SonC@aol.com <SonC@aol.com> wrote:
> One day in the French Quarter on the way to meet Chris, I encountered  a
> woman with a Lomo, a Diana, and a Hassy.   If that ain't cutting  edge.....

That may have been Melissa, a regular poster at toycamera.com and its
forum. I think her blog's url was elvissoutherndeathcult or something
crazy.

Skeptics should browse around the toycamera.com galleries and forum
postings. There are many banal images and images that look kind of
arty because of Holga defects, yes. But also some fine images.
 
Holgas are nice enough cameras for the price ($15-20), especially the
newest ones that take care of the annoyances (film unwinding, backs
falling off, no 6x6 mask) while still employing that lovely plastic
lens.

Using one is no different from Sally Mann employing
turn-of-the-century damaged and decaying lenses for her wet-plate
collodion work. Whatever gets it done.

-- 
MP
wooderson@gmail.com


Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Another camera classic bites the dust)
In reply to: Message from SonC at aol.com (SonC@aol.com) ([Leica] Another camera classic bites the dust)