Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/05/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Further adventures of a lens abuser
From: creativevisions at verizon.net (Michael J Herring)
Date: Sat May 14 13:13:13 2005
References: <PAEILMJJLHOMKKEJDDKIAEEOCMAA.bonvini@optonline.net> <011401c55822$ced38c30$6601a8c0@ic7max3> <4285C4EC.5050408@edd.uio.no>

True, 4x5 tonality is superior to 120. Look at Brett Weston's later work,
which was done with a Rollie SL66 and Agfa 25. Beautiful images.

Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Ridings" <daniel.ridings@edd.uio.no>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 5:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Further adventures of a lens abuser


>I suspose you mean with respect to grain. 120 is nice, but can it really
>compete with 4x5 when it comes to tonality and separation of detail in
>highlights?
>
> Myself, EI 400 is the slowest I ever use, with rare exceptions when I
feel
> in a mood to experiment. I did so with Delta 100 a while back. Very
nice.
> I suspect that Delta 100 would give Agfa APX 25 a good run for the
money,
> something I mean to be a compliment to both.
>
> I don't like to use tripods. So EI 400 gives me sharper shots than the
> slower films would, simply because the higher shutter speed helps me
out.
> You'd be surprised at how much sharpness suffers even at 1/250. Not that
> you can't hold the camera still, but people tend to move. Blurry feet,
> hands etc.
>
> Daniel
>
> Michael J Herring wrote:
>> Agfa 25 was my "normal speed" film for years. 120 negative developed in
>> Rodinal gave results equal to 4x5 Tri-X. Really miss that emulsion!
>>
>> Mike
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jay" <bonvini@optonline.net>
>> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 8:02 AM
>> Subject: RE: [Leica] Further adventures of a lens abuser
>>
>>
>>
>>>What happened to the slow ASA films?
>>>They seemed so sharp and fine grained - it seems that ASA 100 is the
>>>slowest
>>>now.
>>>Anyone have any ideas why the lack of the super fine grain slow speed
>>>film?
>>>
>>>Jay Ignaszewski
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: lug-bounces+bonvini=optonline.net@leica-users.org
>>>[mailto:lug-bounces+bonvini=optonline.net@leica-users.org]On Behalf Of
>>>Dennis Painter
>>>Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 1:52 AM
>>>To: Leica Users Group
>>>Subject: Re: [Leica] Further adventures of a lens abuser
>>>
>>>
>>>Ah for the days of Kodachrome 25, really, great stuff.
>>>Dennis
>>>
>>>Frank Filippone wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Mark..... do you remember the days of ASA 100 film?  I still use
>>
>> it.....
>>
>>>>with F1.4 lenses..... it is fast enough for most situations......
>>>>ASA 1600 film is for ......... others.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 370 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!



In reply to: Message from bonvini at optonline.net (Jay) ([Leica] Further adventures of a lens abuser)
Message from creativevisions at verizon.net (Michael J Herring) ([Leica] Further adventures of a lens abuser)
Message from daniel.ridings at edd.uio.no (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Further adventures of a lens abuser)