Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/05/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Dear All, I have just spent a few days photographing and recording some of my late father's paintings before they were sent on semi-permanent loan to the University of Torun in Poland. I decided for fairly obvious reasons to use my D-1 to take digital images of the 70-odd paintings which have been shipped. I was horrified at the variation in colour between the painting itself, what I saw on the screen and what I actually got on the SD card. Of course I am aware that my eye and the camera don't have the same response characteristics; but interestingly I could do little to get the camera to come close... Is this my D-1, is it common or is there some reasonable explanation? Further, my father painted largely abstract works (you might describe him as an abstract expressionist, but it's not particularly accurate). On those where the boundaries between areas of colour were not distinct the camera appeared to have difficulty in producing a sharp image. The opposite being true where there were strong boundaries. I am coming to the conclusion that the image-reconstruction algorithms taking the output from the chip and building the resultant image in memory must have been fooled. Any thoughts?? FWIW, conditions were flat daylight, no auxiliary lighting. Thanks for any thoughts - as I have a lot more still to do I would like to know if anyone can suggest correction techniques. Although this is a fairly stringent test - and an unusual one - when all is said and done the D-1 is a Leica and should have done better. Peter Dzwig