Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2005/04/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: B.D. PAWS
From: mail at gpsy.com (Karen Nakamura)
Date: Mon Apr 18 21:20:25 2005
References: <200504182335.j3INXIXh035526@server1.waverley.reid.org> <978bf7319d66ac4cde595a21d6d0350c@mindspring.com> <6.2.1.2.2.20050419024708.03ec4550@mail.screengang.com><6a3bb4f5c446d4a3c7 4fd7c25f334807@earthlink.net> <42646216.1070205@cox.net>
>
>Not by taking advantage of these people, rather by using our
>compassion, our utmost sensitivity, and our lens to be their
>lobbyist....
Taking their photo without their permission is, by definition, I
think taking advantage of the homeless. If you really feel like being
a compassionate photographer, ask for their permission first.
Otherwise, you're just feeding off of them.
Karen
Karen Nakamura
http://www.photoethnography.com/ClassicCameras/
http://www.photoethnography.com/blog/
--
Replies:
Reply from feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli) ([Leica] Re: B.D. PAWS)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Re: B.D. PAWS)
In reply to:
Message from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Re: B.D. PAWS (Ted Grant))
Message from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] Re: B.D. PAWS)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Re: B.D. PAWS)