Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On 06-Apr-05, at AM 06:05, Bill Marshall wrote: > Hoods priced separately is a problem? Huh? There are plenty of other > companies that don't include a hood with their lenses. I don't think > that I've ever had a hood included with any of my Nikon lenses. Okay, > maybe one AIS lens. > > Does anyone think that Leica is giving away the hoods for free? Add in > the cost of the hood if you're more comfortable comparing the prices > that way. > > It seems to me that Zeiss is making the hood optional. If your > shooting needs don't require the use of a hood, you don't have to buy > it. Leica requires that you buy the hood whether you ever use it or > not. > Hi Agree. Leica does not supply the hood for "free" anyway - i'm sure the cost is already included. And they are expensive! I just ordered a separate hood for my M 28 f2 asph (got it used with box but no hood) - the cost is astronomical to me, for what seems to be just a piece of plastic. More than twice the price for a much bigger piece of plastic that Canon demands for their lens hood to fit much bigger 77mm diameter lenses :) I do not use a hood with certain lenses, to keep their size compact. I'm sure many of you do the same. Not including the hood allows Zeiss to keep the prices down. As for those expensive finders, one can always buy the Voigtlander ones! ---------- David Teo