[Leica] Why N and C anyway !!

[firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin)]

to be quite honest, why are we discussing Nikons and Canons, the serial 
numbers for which mean nothing to me. Is there no discussion about 
Nikon anywhere else ;-)

On 26/02/2005, at 3:40 PM, David Mason wrote:

> Well my d100 still works great so I'm not screaming for a new one. I
> have had only one really large and annoying complaint about the d100
> and I still don't understand Nikon's motives: To get newer firmware
> for the d100 the owner must ship it to Nikon. I don't know if you are
> aware, but Nikon isn't exactly a J.D. Power & Assc. candidate for best
> customer support so the thought of sending it is... well, its not a
> thought. This is the only dslr that requires such action for updating
> firmware and it makes no sense... at all! I mean, it has a USB
> cable... I have Internet access... every other Nikon is
> downloadable-firmware capable - so, um... why?
>
> To be completely fair to Nikon, Canon ain't no shining example of
> customer communication either.
>
>
> Dave
>
> On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 20:13:37 -0800, Feli <feli2@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>> And what is the deal with the D100? That camera should have been
>> replaced 6-12 months ago. Where is the D200 or D90 or whatever they 
>> are
>> going to call it? Every Nikon digital shooter I run into is screaming
>> bloody murder about this. There is a huge cap between the D70 and the
>> D2x or D2HS.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
Alastair