Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Which 35mm 'cron or 'lux?
From: lambroving at worldnet.att.net (William G. Lamb, III)
Date: Fri Feb 11 18:31:49 2005

Henning,

Not that I take everything that Irwin writes as gospel, but I'll happily 
mail you his M-Lenses pdf if you like. There is little doubt in his mind 
nor mine.

At 11:00 AM 02/11/2005 -0800, you wrote:
>At 7:24 PM -0500 2/10/05, William G. Lamb, III wrote:
>>Carl,
>>
>>Frank's summary was pretty good. Perhaps you are also overlooking another 
>>option to round off your kit?
>>
>>Personally, I love the fingerprint of the 35 Lux ASPH, but it just blocks 
>>too much of the viewfinder to make a compact package with an M and what I 
>>consider to be my "normal" lens. If I want to block my viewfinder, I use 
>>a 28/f2 ASPH which is Leica's modern answer to the 35mm traditional 
>>documentary lens. On all counts it does not disappoint, is one of the 
>>finest Leica lenses, has a wonderful warm fingerprint and is optically 
>>superior to both the 35 Lux ASPH and the 35/2 ASPH.
>
>All three of those lenses are excellent. I've never seen a shred of 
>evidence that states the 28 is better.
>
>>
>>If you want to stick with 35mm, I've got a perfect new black spare which 
>>is surplus to demand because I'm using the LHSA chrome version mainly on 
>>my chrome MP .58. You are welcome to it for $1,250 U.S., complete with 
>>box and case, etc. This lens is capable of the highest image quality in 
>>most circumstances, but it is not perfect. In bright light combined with 
>>conditions of high humidity it can vignette.

I'd imagine that you are correct as far as the theory goes, and I'm not a 
scientist nor am I an engineer. In the REAL world, the 35/f2 ASPH exhibits 
this vignetting noticeably in the conditions I describe. It does not 
otherwise. Several other users I know have experienced the same 
characteristic. Care to account for this phenomenon theoretically? It is 
the one real flaw of the lens, and both mine exhibit it.

Do you happen to have one of these, or are you just guessing? Pardon me for 
asking, but there is no end of guessing, idle and uninformed speculation, 
unrestrained whinging and moaning and the like on the LUG. Generally I 
refrain from comment because the most frequent posters claim to rarely use 
a Leica anymore anyway, and there would be little point. The gent who asked 
the question actually appears to want to buy and use a Leica lens on a 
Leica. Can you believe it?! :-)

>Vignetting is a function of optical design, mechanical construction and 
>aperture. It is never affected by light level or humidity (unless you 
>breath heavily on it). :-)
>
>>Can't say if the 35 Lux ASPH does because I've never owned one..., but 
>>the 28/2 ASPH is no larger than the Lux ASPH and most certainly does not.
>>
>>Best,
>>
>>William
>
>    *            Henning J. Wulff
>   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
>  /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
>  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com

William



Replies: Reply from dorysrus at mindspring.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Which 35mm 'cron or 'lux now pdf files)
Reply from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Which 35mm 'cron or 'lux?)