Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>>That would cannibalize their new-camera business. > >Didier, how would they cannibalize their new-camera business if the resale >price were, asy, 2/3 of new price? No, I rather think they would bring in >more new Leica users. Seth, Because many Leica aficionado would buy certified preowned's instead of new ones, thats my guess. But 2/3 price of a new one would be too much to attract many new customers, especially in these days, where, for instance, more and more prictures at our list's gallery are shot with R-D1's or 20d's; and when the CV Bessa's are getting better and better and even Zeiss Ikon comes up with a new film RF camera. Consider me as a new customer (one year and a half ago). I was offered a M6 with a damaged shutter for $220 - I asked around for the repair costs and finally had a M6 for significantly less than $1k. Two thirds of the price of a new one? Never! Would have bought a Bessa R2 instead, not a Leica. No, Leica needs new products such as a convincing digital M to survive. The preowned filmcamera business would give peanuts only. Didier