Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2005/01/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Doomed: Leica MP 0.58x
From: rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig)
Date: Mon Jan 24 11:21:56 2005
References: <000501c5016f$001f0e00$6401a8c0@ccapr.com> <41F4F453.7080408@adrenaline.com> <41F4FDAC.3070205@gmx.de> <6.2.0.14.2.20050124151237.041bf030@mail.screengang.com> <p06200725be1ab80262c6@[131.142.12.152]> <948449FC-6E2A-11D9-BBA3-000D933F4332@earthlink.net>
Feli
Me, too. Thats exactly the point about smaller sensors. It's not the
crop-factor, it's the DOF-factor.
Didier
>Yes, but how will I get that razor thin level of depth of field without a
>full frame sensor?
>I really don;t want my 50 to have the DOF of a 35. ;-)
>feli
In reply to:
Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Doomed: Leica MP 0.58x)
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Doomed: Leica MP 0.58x)
Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas M.Sharp) ([Leica] Doomed: Leica MP 0.58x)
Message from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] Doomed: Leica MP 0.58x)
Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor) ([Leica] Doomed: Leica MP 0.58x)
Message from feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli) ([Leica] Doomed: Leica MP 0.58x)