[Leica] Which was the "poor quality" Leica - M4-2 or M4-P?

[feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli)]

M4-2. The early ones can be a little temperamental. I have a late one 
which Sherry
went over without any complaints. The M4-P is a very nice camera. Sort 
of a M6 without
the meter, but nice touches like black crinkle paint and the early ones 
have the bigger frame lines. I think the P stood for 'Pro'

feli


On Jan 22, 2005, at 10:37 AM, Vick Ko wrote:

> Can you tell me which was considered the "poor quality" Leica, the M4-2
> or M4-P?
>
> Which was first?
>
> What was the significance of the "P"?
>
> And any truth to the entire statement of "poorer quality" Leica, from a
> working and repair-bills point of view?
>
> Regards,
>
> Vick Ko
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
________________________________________________________
feli2@earthlink.net                     2 + 2 = 4                      
www.elanphotos.com