Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Michiel's PAW 49-52 NOW neopan 1600
From: michiel.fokkema at wanadoo.nl (Michiel Fokkema)
Date: Wed Jan 5 12:07:11 2005
References: <23864236.1104947345447.JavaMail.root@wamui05.slb.atl.earthlink.net>

Phong wrote:
> Robert Meier wrote:
> 
>>... I have used Neopan 1600 and the results look very close to Tri-X, that 
>>is, 
>>no harsh, washed out highlights.  I develop it myself so I can control 
>>what 
>>I get.  You should try doing the processing yourself -- it's amazingly 
>>simple.
> 
> 
> Bob, and other Neopan 1600 users,
> 
> What developer(s) do you use for Neopan 1600 ?
> How well does it work with D76, which is what I
> use for B&W (meaning TriX except when the store
> is out, in which case it's usually TMY)
> 
Hi Phong,

Of course i don't know how well Neopan 1600 goes with D76 but this is 
the link to the specification which lists a lot of developers including 
three different solutions of D76.
http://www.fujifilm.com/JSP/fuji/epartners/bin/Neopan1600.pdf


Michiel

In reply to: Message from phongdoan at mindspring.com (Phong) ([Leica] Michiel's PAW 49-52)