Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Michiel's PAW 49-52
From: s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov)
Date: Wed Jan 5 11:29:05 2005
References: <23864236.1104947345447.JavaMail.root@wamui05.slb.atl.earthlink.net>

I use straight 76, exposing the film at iso800-1000 and processing at 
the iso1600 time.
S. Dimitrov

On Jan 5, 2005, at 9:49 AM, Phong wrote:

> Robert Meier wrote:
>>
>> ... I have used Neopan 1600 and the results look very close to Tri-X, 
>> that is,
>> no harsh, washed out highlights.  I develop it myself so I can 
>> control what
>> I get.  You should try doing the processing yourself -- it's amazingly
>> simple.
>
> Bob, and other Neopan 1600 users,
>
> What developer(s) do you use for Neopan 1600 ?
> How well does it work with D76, which is what I
> use for B&W (meaning TriX except when the store
> is out, in which case it's usually TMY)
>
> I figure trying Neopan 1600 is a lot cheaper than
> upgrading from a Summicron to a Noctilux :-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> - Phong
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
Slobodan Dimitrov
Photography


In reply to: Message from phongdoan at mindspring.com (Phong) ([Leica] Michiel's PAW 49-52)